How Professors Think: Inside The Curious World Of Academic Judgment Michele Lamont Harvard University Press Αγγλικά Βιβλία Education Studies Exam

Excellence Originality Intelligence Everyone In Academia Stresses Quality But What Exactly Is It And How Do Professors Identify It? The Academic Evaluation System Known As “Peer Review ” Highly Respected Pass Judgment Usually Confidentially On Work Of Others Only Those Present Deliberative Chambers Know Said Michèle Lamont Observed Deliberations For Fellowships Research Grants Interviewed Panel Members At Length Think She Reveals Discovered About This Secretive Powerful Peculiar World Anthropologists Political Scientists Literary Scholars Economists Historians Philosophers Don’t Share Same Standards Prefer Mathematical Models Favor Different Kinds Evidence Care Much If Other Understand Them When They Come Together Peer Assessment Academics Are Expected To Explain Their Criteria Respect Each Other’s Expertise Guard Against Admiring That Resembles Own Must Decide: Original Important? Brave Or Glib? Timely Merely Trendy? Pro-Diversity Interdisciplinary Enough?Judging Isn’t Robotically Rational It’s Emotional Cognitive Social Too Yet Most Academics’ Self-Respect Rooted Ability Analyze Complexity Recognize Order Fairest Decisions Elusive God “Excellence Aims Illuminate Confidential Process Push Gatekeepers Both Better Perform Role Σελίδες: 336 Έτος Έκδοσης: 1030 Διαστάσεις: 14X14Cm